Response to Sheen: 9/11 Commission & CFR threaten America with Nuclear 9/12 ?

After the bravery of Charlie Sheen for thrusting 9/11 back into the spotlight, vice chairman of the 9/11 Commission Lee Hamilton said:

"I am sure that the terrorists will strike again. We know what their intent is. ... It is very simple: They want to kill as many of us as they can." ^{Lexington Herald}

Similarly we also have Chairman Thomas Kean setting the stage for a nuclear attack,

"repeating over and over again that the biggest threat right now is small nuclear devices being smuggled in across our completely unsecured borders and setting off the next escalation of the so-called war on terror (so be sure to start being afraid of that soon). The source of the material to make these fearsome nuclear devices would be none other than the former Soviet Union." ^Infowars

And then there is the Council on Foreign Relations, which is the famous and influential private oligarch/political elite think-tank and often described as the US arm of the UK's Royal Institute of International affairs saying on that,

"the United States hasn't mounted the high-priority effort needed against the most devastating threat it faces — nuclear terrorism. Stealing a nuclear device is tough, the author found, but not impossible" ^{USA Today}

But it gets a lot worse in the next paragraph:

"The same day, government officials testified that undercover investigators slipped through security at the Canadian and Mexican borders with enough radioactive material to make two small "dirty bombs." Border agents were fooled by counterfeit documents, according to the Government Accountability Office"

The nuclear/dirty bomb drills are extremely alarming, as there has been a well-noted parallel between recent and 'pivotal' acts of terrorism and such exercises. And one wonders, who are these undercover investigators working for ? The CFR or the actual government ?

Are we to interpret this theme as a veiled threat in response to Sheen: "Back off or it will be 9/12" ?

Despite it sometimes being called the 'Kean Commission' reflecting chairman Thomas Kean, Philip Zelikow ^{1 2 3} was the real head of the 9/11 commission, and according to David Ray Griffin he also wrote Bush's pre-emptive war doctrine, but it gets worse. Zelikow (along with the then just-retired and disgraced CIA head) co-wrote the entire blueprint via the Council on Foreign Relations' journal Foreign Affairs for what amounts to the domestic War on Terror and the political atmosphere we see today. But it gets worse still. He didn't write it after September 11th 2001, he wrote it in December 1998:

"In the November-December 1998 issue of Foreign Affairs, he co-authored an article entitled “Catastrophic Terrorism,” in which he speculated that if the 1993 bombing of the World Trade Center had succeeded, “the resulting horror and chaos would have exceeded our ability to describe it. Such an act of catastrophic terrorism would be a watershed event in American history. It could involve loss of life and property unprecedented in peacetime and undermine America’s fundamental sense of security, as did the Soviet atomic bomb test in 1949. Like Pearl Harbor, the event would divide our past and future into a before and after. The United States might respond with draconian measures scaling back civil liberties, allowing wider surveillance of citizens, detention of suspects and use of deadly force. More violence could follow, either future terrorist attacks or U.S. counterattacks. Belatedly, Americans would judge their leaders negligent for not addressing terrorism more urgently.” ^Wikipedia

Additionally,

"Zelikow's area of academic expertise is the creation and maintenance of, in his words, “public myths” or “public presumptions,” which he defines as “beliefs (1) thought to be true (although not necessarily known to be true with certainty), and (2) shared in common within the relevant political community." In his academic work and elsewhere he has taken a special interest in what he has called “‘searing’ or ‘molding’ events [that] take on ‘transcendent’ importance and, therefore, retain their power even as the experiencing generation passes from the scene" ^{Foreign Affairs} ...it also describes the Pearl Harbour event as laid out in the Project for the New American Century, and noted by CFR'er Zbigniew Brzezinski* who described the need for a new threat to enable empirialism

*Brzezinski was also noted for his role in the formation of the pre-cursor to 'Al Qaeda'

Anyone see a problem here ?

9/11 Philip Zelikow 9/11 Commission War on Terror CFR Tony Blair